re: gone up folks - phmforlove this is from sharescene!I just...

re: gone up folks - phmforlove this is from sharescene!


I just received email from Prof John Moore (RE: The "Questions over Uranium Find" Article)

I basically asked him about the statements he has made regarding the find in Hakskeen. This is his reply:

Dear John,

I am afraid that I have been mis-attributed in this article. The reporter
phoned me, but I did not have any direct information regarding the Hakskeen
deposit.
He told me that the radiometric anomaly was reportedly related to thorium. I
then told him that if that was the case, then the anomaly could not be
related to carnotite in calcrete/gypcrete as carnotite does not contain
thorium. I then explained to him the nature of thorium anomalies - that
section is correctly attributed to me.
I told him that I visit the Rossing area (not Hakskeen area) on an annual
basis to show my students the difference between real and false uranium
anomalies.
All the references attributed to me regarding the nature of the Hakskeen
deposit and aerial anomalies are incorrect as I had no knowledge of the
geology of the area.

I therefore cannot help you in this regard and suggest that you contact Dr
Steven.

Regards
John Moore