LMAO!!??
"Of course you didn't bother to include to include a link or a quote from a particular post, did you."
WTF? Really!?
"The last 100% certain bullish outlook I gave on PLS was a bit over 2 years ago when the price was in the low 30c range."
LMAO!!?? Really!?
Correct, I didn't bother as given it is absolutely an undeniable FACT, I didn't think I needed too and I certainly didn't expect you do deny it.
But seeing as how you appear to be becoming forgetful in your old age mate here are a few quotes as requested.....they all are pretty much the same as the rest of your posts from that time and all are VERY BULLISH.
"$1.76 for me thanks @h00ts"
Jan 2019 price at time of posting was just 70 cents.
So over 150% increase isn't bullish in 2019!? Really!?
"At some point in the next few years I do expect a shortage of lithium because of the market growth rate. There is also the real possibility of a sudden reduction of brine lithium supply due to a weather event in the Atacama."
".... IMHO all hard rock producing stocks would go ballistic as the shortage in lithium supply would force prices much higher. PLS would show huge quarterly increases in cashflow, so the fantastic growth rate would likely send the stock price on a huge spike, who knows how high......" Dec 2018
" Overall those of us that have held PLS for a long time have been correct in assuming the very conservative 'expert analysts' were going to be wrong in their forward pricing. I can see no reason to change that view with the growth rates of EVs being above forecasts, the take up of large Li-ion batteries happening (not predicted by 'analysts' 2 years ago), and average size of EV batteries being larger than predicted." Dec 2018
Well said.
Again, apologies I didn't think I would have to quote something that was sooo obviously true.
Anyway, it just doesn't pass the pub test mate. If you asked anyone here, prior to this recent 180 degree u-turn, I sespect they would all have said that you were VERY BULLISH on PLS.
Anyway, it doesn't really matter.
The only reason I commented is that I was taken aback that after your constant pumping of PLS (then dissapearance from this thread... but not others), that you would reappear, so frequently and strongly telling people PLS is going no where for years.
I was surprised and I called you on it. That's all mate. Oh and it was a pretty funny picture of someone trying a backflip.
It is not an issue to me when people say that they are selling when they are buying or visa versa.
It isn't a problem when people go to the trouble to create large lists of stock holders with their holdings with contact details and advice from them when they buy and sell etc,. Then dissapear with that very valuable information and NO further contact.
It is fair game when people do backflips or run down a stock in the hopes of buying it cheaper or the opposite.
It's all good!
You just surprised me and I dare say a few others. That's all mate. It was almost like you sold most of your holding at say .9 and were now looking to kick the stock when it was down and buy significantly more to rinse and repeat....NOT that you would do that of course.
Secondly, reference proving you wrong about your assumptions regards PLS moving forward....
I do not need too, I can just use your own words from the recent past to weaken your now bullish position.
A short while ago you were super bullish and now you are super bearish.
Moreover, a few short months ago when you were unflinchingly pumping PLS, you used all sorts of figures and assumptions to justify your position, just like you are now doing advocating the opposite.
All I said was that the truth, I suspect, "lies", somewhere in the middle.
Lets see who is right in the next few months.
I hope the "quotes", clarified any confusion.... but to be honest I could have used almost any of your posts from that time.
We all have our own narrative to push (at any given time), don't we.
Just saying!!
(20min delay)