Good News & Bad News, page-29422

my opinion only- and I'm a pessimist sceptic.

1. the P/E ratio is carefully managed by the 'manager' or AI. obviously share price growth benefits the owners and the side hussle generates income - but need to ensure min superfund returns or loose the fund management gig.

AI can easily manage SP down to the cent when applied - with a significant shareholding and multiple vehicles to trade between.

eg. unprecemented demand can be curtailed by trading between 2 related COY's at low prices. Mostly pricing can be controlled by small frequent trades during open. We see it all the time.

It's not about eliminating growth - it's about controlling growth and especially controlling growth waves. Money is made either way - shorting or growing.

2. I don't believe there are any limits on trade values if agreed. But I stand to be corrected by anyone. It's how gaps open isn't it? I further believe AI is smart enough to lay gaps for future use - hence the high likelihood of filling.

What I see is significant trade volumes at close to current value designed to either contain or encourage SP movement.

Movement of a stock price generates income up or down. Knowing the turning points generates even more.

Having several hundred latest gen AI computers hard wired to the actual market database would seem to be an unbeatable position.

Trading a millisecond before anyone else because your cable is 1 foot shorter and utilising AI to decide on buy/sell cannot be beaten. The 1% get richer.

I want to be smart and tag along.