The taxonomy of logical fallacies is fun. I think you would have...

The taxonomy of logical fallacies is fun. I think you would have done better to call out a slippery slope fallacy on me, but it would still fail IMO.

I think YOUR post is more like a straw man than mine because it doesn't accurately reflect what I was referring to. Maybe you were thinking of hydrogen cars. Last year six were sold, so if they double next year it will be 12. Battery EVs were 87,217, if they double this year it will be a problem for ICE sellers, potentially taking around 20% of the market from them. It's not a slippery slope argument because there are good reasons to believe the huge growth of EV sales will continue. Maybe not double, but it's possible. More models are coming, including lower cost ones from at least three makers, and emissions standards are on their way... OK that last one is due in 2025, but it could be a big factor in doubling (or whatever) next year. Similar rules kept Tesla profitable in the US for a long time, they attract supply to Europe and other markets that already have them.