Good News & Bad News, page-45563

PLS has a P/E of over 30 with an annual net profit growth of NEGATIVE 89%.

LTM has a P/E less than 10, makes significantly more money in net profit per quarter than PLS and is more diversified, vertically integrated and has LESS DEBT than PLS.

PLS has $1B in debt and another $500M + in extra dilution not yet accounted for in the already ridiculously inflated market cap.

Uprampers here, @O.C.WA actually legitimately claimed BHP made a net loss last year when they in fact made $13B in net profit and have a P/E less than half of PLS.

There is not a single metric on which PLS looks like a good investment. Not a single one. They are making significantly less in profit per quarter than LTM and are valued at 3 times the price on a P/E basis.

SQM, ALB have significantly more revenue in a single quarter than PLS has in a whole year and are much more diversified, vertically integrated and have market caps not much more than PLS.