So Luso would be “perimiter drilling” to expand the NLI sqkm’s to retain the alledged 30% we have heard off. Now that is all making sense.
So that begs 3 questions.
1. Why were we not informed, as it is COMMON practice? (We are all aware of farm-ins.)
2. Why would we care because if they prove up an extra 30% ( provided that drilling area is viable, which becomes an expensive argument in court because you have Expert vs Expert and neither judge/jury knows what the hell they are talking about or can see it. Blind faith justice.)
3. As “first movers” in the current race for production why would Portugal throw NLI “under the bus”. Wouldnt that quell further decisions to mine.
(20min delay)