Expectations need to be in check. I researched the living s$@t out of this stock after the scare. Contacted labs that ran analysis in 1960s and also the governing geology bodies for USA who released the reports...500 ppm is confirmed as stated.... The 1700 I can't get an answer on as the company that done its data retention is to 2009. Whilst some labs did not test for lithium due to high shale contents masking the result, so left it out due to inconclusive testing. I'd be expecting anywhere from 69-200 ppm from this well. This is only my opinion guys. But it is a more realistic one.
Good old fireside chat, page-4106
Add ASN (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
13.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $167.7M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 13.0¢ | 13.5¢ | 13.0¢ | $137.5K | 1.052M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 162999 | 13.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 13.5¢ | 619258 | 14 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 30/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
13.0¢ |
Change
0.000 ( 1.96 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 13.0¢ | 13.5¢ | 12.8¢ | 640677 | ||
| Last updated 15.59pm 30/05/2024 ? | |||||
| ASN (ASX) Chart |