one of the biggest headlines IF it comes from the judge will be that
'there's no difference in risk to the community whether he is vaccinated or unvaccinated - transmission is the same.'
that'll throw a huge pussy among the pigeons
there's data to burn now that the only risk to the community from not being vaccinated is the pressure on hospitals and medical resources
if an argument for risk in this case of taking up hospital facilities comes - then, he's surely got to be seen as low risk -
he's not exactly obese, probably doesn't smoke, perhaps doesn't drink at all or very little and doesn't look to have any health issues
he'd be in a very low risk category - he'd have to be to be a champion
if it comes to an argument about personal risk - the government is as dead as a doornail on that one IMO
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Govt reframes Djokovic Case
Govt reframes Djokovic Case, page-117
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 128 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)