I really don't understand the rhetoric of Super is not meant to be a wealth creator...the logic there seems flawed....would it not be better for super to be a wealth creator , that way folk that have retired will never go on the full age pension as some whose funds get exhausted in later life , ...I mean I would like my kids to inherit my super as a nest egg or a boost for their super so that they would not rely fully on the old age pension.....I thought it would have been logical for myself and my future generations NOT to be on any form of government handout....I mean the government would save a load of money....this idea of not meaning to be a wealth creator to me is counter productive.
