Yeah, the difference in project success between PGI and GPM is still quite staggering, even given some of the variations in ore type.
(Quote) "Albion process plant supplied as fixed price technology package on EP basis working with owners team"
So, who supplied and built and tested the GPM plant?
Were they not the same people as PGI used, and if not - why not?
Where did the management of PGI fail in building their plant? Was it because they tried to build a cheap alternative?
There are many questions here.
Somebody needs to stand up, stop making excuses, and provide some truth (by the sounds of it).
As for the Chinese and the recent PGI announcements, why would they take a holding in PGI and use it's technology, when they can get a fixed price solution, and then use GPM as their consultants?
Gw
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AAU
- GPM/ Xstrata
GPM/ Xstrata, page-5
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 49 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AAU (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.4¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $3.487M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.4¢ | 0.4¢ | 0.4¢ | $959 | 243.8K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
51 | 44662637 | 0.3¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.4¢ | 18527960 | 19 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
45 | 40699100 | 0.003 |
19 | 17025536 | 0.002 |
13 | 23117950 | 0.001 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.004 | 18527960 | 19 |
0.005 | 9248993 | 9 |
0.006 | 1358026 | 3 |
0.007 | 3306213 | 4 |
0.008 | 3277307 | 3 |
Last trade - 15.44pm 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
AAU (ASX) Chart |