Hi Process1. I disagree with several of your comments.
"It is obvious that GPP has most valuable assets and technology. All projects are active and will be produce excellent results near future."
IMO they are far from proving that the assets or technology are commercially viable, and therefore valuable. Morabisi has shown that there is some potential for lithium, based at present upon rock chip assays collected over a distance of 742m, of which three out of fourteen samples, within a 235m length of that 742m, graded ~1%. Nor is the project particularly active, in the sense that there is nobody on site in Guyana atm, while assays are awaited (and what happened to the XRD analysis, expected within 1 - 2 weeks of the 30/3/17 ann, but not mentioned since, in either the quarterly or the 1/5/17 Morabisi Project Update?). How can you could possibly know that excellent results will be produced in the near future? You can't, this is just a ramp. As for OHD, there are indications that it might have a product of interest with the bio-stimulant, but that is far from proven in terms of commercial viability. Once again, you are ramping on the basis of scant information.
"GPP Technology can do this via its novel technology that can convert coal into fertilizer. Based on recent results, this company is in an enviable position to disrupt the market as its technology could produce bio-stimulant fertilisers at 1/10th the cost of traditional fertilisers."
Based on recent results, there are indications from laboratory condition tests that the bio-stimulant works. We haven't, however, seen the full results of the tests, and there haven't been any field tests done on broad acre crops. Nor have we had detailed costings of the process - as I've mentioned before, they don't seem to have included any energy costs in their figures - heating up the 800,000lt of water required by the proposed pilot plant every day to 320C is a costly exercise, even if you can recycle some of the heat.
"OHD is non-gasification, commercially feasible and environmentally friendly process to convert macromolecular organic solids into low molecular weight chemicals."
Again, not shown to be commercially feasible.
"OHD process & technology test and trial results universally accepted. This OHD proven process will be converting quickly in the most efficient and economical manner possible. Currently OHD process in advance stages to convert as production level."
Universally accepted? You've got to be kidding! How many engineers and scientists outside of a narrow band of coal to chemicals professionals would have heard of it? And into what is the OHD proven process converting? One list of VBC products shows that the majority of chemicals are solids, insoluble in water. Another list says that it produces Vanilla, bio-degradable plastics and oxygenated fuels (I can see the oxygenated fuels in the first list, but there isn't a huge demand for them, although there aren't any bio-degradeable plastics or Vanilla there). And the bio-stimulant, interesting results from lab tests.
The PDU has been running since 2013. Why haven't they collected enough output to do a broad acre trial? At an application rate of 10 lt/ha it wouldn't take much. A daily run of 5kg VBC feed would yield 200lt, enough for 20 ha.
So my summary is that they have some interesting projects, but that none of them are close to commercialisation. Both major projects require large amounts of capital to develop the existing findings further, which IMO is necessary before any values can be ascribed to either project.
Expand
(20min delay)