graham's "orbis vs paperlynx", page-4

austted

Thank you for the free publicity.

I don't intend debating your views, which I seem to recall are generous and of good faith. We simply disagree.

However when you say: "Graham has already told us that Orbis also hold PXU." you're forgetting that clear communication of a point of view (regardless of whether you agree or not) is best achieved if the article is self contained.

This repetition irks my fingers but is intentional, for:

(1) completeness
(2) new readers
(3) past readers not as intelligent as you.

However I'm sure there will be critics of this too.