Grant Thorton IP Valuation Review

The company Touted six months ago, that Grant Thorton was reviewing the value of the company Patent(IP) portfolio.

Where is this Material Valuation document, and while they are at, disclosure transparency, where is the KPMG Security Warrant PenTest full document, I am not aware that either has been released by any of the Accredited Board members as Material Disclosure.

Dispersive Networks

This is a link, to a U.S. based Cyber company. They do, and have successfully done, everything Iwebgate\NET said,or say, it does, with it's IP protection, in the U.S., with multiple IC\USG customers.

Here is a product release last month, you might find familiar.

https://dispersive.io/2020/03/20/a-fast-secure-edge-with-universal-appeal/

And here is a link list, of some of Dispersive's IP portfolio. That is what a Tech company does when it has Patents.
https://dispersive.io/patents/

Compare and contrast.

The Dispersive seminal IP, was first filed in 2007, granted in 2011, Iwebgates position is narrow, and easily circumvented as a methodology, as this U.S. Patent 7,895.348 patent clearly shows.

Iwebgate was state of the art in 2010, should have, could have...been a bloody Unicorn. It happens, missing that window, far more than you can ever know.

As a company, Dispersive took that initial position, and expanded it quite successfully, how many other Patents did Iwebgate file, a question Tim Gooch may want to answer on this forum.

USPT 7,895,348
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=7895348.PN.&OS=PN/7895348&RS=PN/7895348

The technology market moves at lightening speed, and the competition is so tough, you have to experience it to appreciate it.

If NET's technology was some how resurrected, or became great, The Chinese CCP would simply abscond with it, in Tech, we know that when the CCP starts trying to steal your technology, you must really be on to something.