Graphene still ticking the boxes, page-5

You realise that there are about 3 million layers of graphene in 1 mm of graphite, Kama? How much graphite do you think is required for this emerging technology? Graphene is about as relevant to a graphite producer wannabe as the NLN matra is in the scheme of things.

Graphene is every bit "ABSTRACT" as the adjective and verb definitions suggest. Its conceptual, theoretical and separate in context of WKT's woes.

By the time WKT make it to production (which is highly theoretical given it still hasn't got funding), other nano-technologies will have surpassed graphene. Halloysite is a far cleaner mineral that is likely to eclipse graphene. But that's another futuristic and unrelated investment story.

Needless to say, the only thing of relevance in your post is the statment "Slow and steady wins the race." I've read that mantra before. BSM's once resident ramper used to write "Happy Multi-Bagger Investing" at the end of his posts... well, until reality set in and then the mantra became "Slow and steady wins the race." Oh, the irony! NLN and this latest mantra epitomise the dreamtime story of the Lindi Jumbo project.