It seems odd that he did not explore thecapital structure expected at the time of production.
Dilution from either options being exercised or capital raisings required to fund production are important when looking at investment risk/return.
The dilutive effects of MNS 200m options and TON future capital raisings are ignored. Not sure for SYR?
So we cannot rely on Table 5 of the report. It is way out!
While he made good observations relating to MNS reduced project funding and sales risks, the end result is that his analysis is flawed and limited.
IMO, a good investment analysis ends with a value/share basis and shows all it's assumptions.
If only we could get the right assumptions .... good luck
- Forums
- ASX - General
- Graphite stocks comparison
It seems odd that he did not explore thecapital structure...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 66 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
EQN
EQUINOX RESOURCES LIMITED.
Zac Komur, MD & CEO
Zac Komur
MD & CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online