Opaline (or any other geo interested in VMS)...
Correct me if I'm wrong.... the anomaly at Churchill is probably not just crustal thickness because it is localized and because the first drill hole showed that there is a compositional reason .... at least iron oxide, hopefully more.
RT is suggesting that if the 2nd hole shows more of the same, the sp will rise 20-60%.
It seems to me that given the reason the anomaly IS compositional, the result for Hole 2 has to be either more massive, or closer to the surface compared to hole 1. There is clearly a positive gravity anomaly gradient between the first hole and the second.
Why would this not be the case? For what reason can it be a worse result than the first hole???
gravity anomaly mapping 101
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 11 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add CRI (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.4¢ |
Change
0.002(16.7%) |
Mkt cap ! $37.39M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.3¢ | 1.4¢ | 1.3¢ | $30.57K | 2.280M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 697143 | 1.3¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.4¢ | 2022635 | 7 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.46pm 27/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CRI (ASX) Chart |