Hi Retiredyoung,I concur, from the diagram i got an alpha angle...

Hi Retiredyoung,

I concur, from the diagram i got an alpha angle of 48 degrees for MFEC002, 45 degrees for MFED001 and 30 degrees for MFED007 giving true widths of 74.3%, 70.7% and 50% of downhole widths (plus or minus a couple of percent)

While we can measure the angle made relative to the dip of the basal contact of the ultramafic and related mineralisation, we are still assuming that each hole has intersected the contact perpendicular to the strike of the unit. If not the true widths will be slightly less than those calculated.

Would be good if the cross section also showed a plan view slice at the top also.

All fun n games really.