great announcement, page-81

> What about port upgrade, rail holding yard, trucks?, rail hoppers? benefication plant, accommodation?

If you are asking this in relation to the previous point, i.e. why would a partner provide their own capital infrastructure when instead they can buy a state in MAK.

port upgrade - this is being funded publicly not privately

rail holding yard (at Tennant Creek) - Bill Gibbins is involved in this, and it's what he does. If he thinks he can provide a piece of the jigsaw and make a profit, there is nothing wrong in that. Everybody wins

rail hoppers - if you're a rail freight co, you already have the hoppers. No capex required

trucks - if you're a trucking co, you already have the trucks

beneficiation plant - It's DSO.

All of these things should be obvious to someone such as yourself who has dedicated his time to discrediting the co. by every available means. You are deliberately attempting to disinform.