MnI agree. Beibu Gulf has several items going for it in a very...

Mn

I agree. Beibu Gulf has several items going for it in a very positive fashion:

1. No real PSA geological input into the project. Not the case with their GOM work.
2. No real PSA reserves input to the size of BG, they simply report what they are told by the Operator. Not the case with GOM projects.
3. No real PSA operational input to BG. Not the case with GOM projects.
4. No real PSA fiscal input to BG, give the Operator the check(s) and go sit in the back of the bus and hush. Not the case with GOM projects.

There are more, one could feel certain. BG is all positive from an investers perspective. Purely illustrative, moving forward with BG means they should consider the broken leg on that 3 legged stool. Can PSA do both, GOM & BG? One would think not but I'm probably incorrect here.