Share
clock Created with Sketch. 17/05/17
22:02
Share
Originally posted by Fingers xed
↑
Zulu , I like your posts but please do not speak on my behalf " The main problem with the PFS is it left us all feeling misled by Keith " I seriously do not feel mislead , KC clearly indicated we were roasting months ago , he clearly stated looking at six alternative routes and would pick the best one . This is after all a PRE feasibility means the story still needs to unfold with greater depth , the advance study will clearly have greater production than the PFS . The pfs shows us to make $135 million a year if you add the $2,000 a tonne LI price that others do in their feasibility studies we will make $175 million , double the production and we are up too $350 million add your own price earnings multiple and where do you think our price will be . A PE of 10 values us at $3.5 Billion dollars at this level which will aprox be $10.00 to $14 a share AUD . There is no issue of trust in my eyes just a bloody great buying opportunity . Re capex increase , may I suggest at the announcement of previous estimates , would they have known we had to put the crushing plant under ground ? I suspect this was a request by Czech Republic and form part of the agreement to get mining permits recently . We are still on our way Zulu , I think this is just a temporary gliche .
Expand
Agreed, the decision to put the crusher underground would have added to the Capex as did the associated underground conveying system and the stockpile. However, this might reduces the amount of trucks required and potentially reduce opex.
