It was “delivering substantial abatement while making a return...

It was “delivering substantial abatement while making a return to the taxpayer’’. Its abolition would cost taxpayers up to $200 million a year in lost revenue.

“It will cost the taxpayer more to shut down the CEFC than it will save,’’ Ms Broadbent said.



you should also post this on the political forum
it's a vindication of the carbon tax and a practical application of the lomborg approach to agw