As an engineer I continue to see lots of projects to reinvent the wheel
IE why do we have technically difficult schemes to produce power, schemes which are curiously short of any sort of cost analysis and also where carbon neutral is basically a fallacy
Carbon neutral as a description has zero to do with cutting anything bad in the enviorment
It simply means we can produce excessive amounts of CO2 as long as we also get rid of lots of it.
Could it be that Australia is one of the worlds biggest deserts due to the lack of co2 production
There has never been any definitive proof that co2 is bad for us or the planet
Were the Aboriginals, rated as one of the worlds original inhabitants with their primitive way of life in fact the reason that with zero industry they starved the country of co2 hence desert instead of green forests
There has never been any proof that Australia's portion of co2 emission is harmful or could it be beneficial
What has happened to the core values of science with debate, discussion, tests etc they are all missing in the loony green discussion
Hydrogen has been used as a fuel for hundreds of years
Batteries have been used to provide power for over one hundred years
Pumped Hydro does work
BUT in practical terms none of these have ever worked successfully and none of these have been scientifically tested as to being cost efficiency
The western world in the hands of socialists have continued to pour money into schemes designed to close all manufacturing, close all food production and send the western world bankrupt and force the people to go back to living in trees
To all sensible people, look around and take your country back
