I probably will hanrahan. There's no point continuing to highlight glaring and serious inconsistencies in the AGW debate while not receiving a sensible response, but instead receiving rubbish comments. It's a sign of weakness.
greenhouse gas science a fraud., page-122
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 234 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)