Greenland -Geopolicy strat. Issues, page-18

nro again it is time you started some research but I will answer some of your wild statements below;
1) there is plenty of light rare earths outside china the Chinese have enough lights to keep the world going for hundreds of years. If china wants more light rare earths, mountain pass at high grades with a complete chemical treatment plant and in operation is the next source ,GGG does not recover all its heavies and will refine in China so should be regarded as part of Chinas production as far as the U.S. is concerned
2) again you attacK Tanbreez without any data perhaps eudialyte is the worlds solution to the Chinese rare earth monopoly problem with three Canadian, one Swedish two Russian plus Tanbreez all doing work successfully on this mineral. However this success is not restricted to companies, have a look at the academic work being done by the Colorado school of mines or at Aachen in Germany on eudialyte. All have shown ways to successfully treat eudialyte from a range of projects. the writing was on the wall re eudialyte when even your JV partners have suggested you look for eudialite
3) all this research is towards eudialyte not steenstrupine why well perhaps you should go and research some old reports on the refractory nature of this mineral. there is one by the Danish institute of petrology in 1982 of 56 pages headed "laboratory investigation of refractory uranium minerals at kvanefeld
4) one of your deposits is named after the great expert geo himself Henning Sorensen (who published over a 100 papers on this intrusion) who published a paper on the refractory nature of the kvanefeld ore in that same year.
GGG recovery of 50% of the uranium and little of the heavy rare earth suggest it is still refractory. and that's why I am not happy as that should have been fixed by now