I propose they change the name of the company, its asx code doesn't represent the name. and the name itself is too ambiguous. It would allow it to distance itself from previous management, importantly. What's has been done will always be remembered for the wrong reasons and won't assist new investors looking at the company no matter how promising it may seem. Just my 2c worth.
greenmount, page-2
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)