This thread has gone to crap by the way, but one point of clarification here. Growing seasons are probably irrelevant right now in testing because they are been grown in the lab than in the field - in a controlled environment. Right now waiting for canola trials. This is why I say as long as in the broad acre field - i.e. not in the 'lab' - they can show yields are at least equivalent to their competitors and the cost is true at 1/10th of competitors then GPP will get market share. All the lab results show is that yes it works and given the yields in the field it looks promising (refer prior sentence).
Maybe a question to ask yourself is whether all these additional tests are been requested by a potential JV partner as I posted a week or so back and the latest quarterly adds to that mystery.
Post #:
24208899
Anyway if the pilot plant qualifies for the R&D tax incentive then this will have implications for improving project economics and possibility of getting a JV partner onboard for pilot IMO - i'll take one post from the 'todays trading' thread in the chat with
@ans25 (who unfortunately is back in the sin bin). But still awaiting the advice of a tax accountant if this hypothesis is correct in this post.
Post #:
24232200
There was also some stuff around a Minister's statement in Guyana and the post below is my take followed by
@ans25 in that thread. If the Minister is correct then the perception is some 'shallow' drilling is been undertaken in the area but that is pure speculation as the Minister might just have got it wrong.
Post #:
24231528
Post #:
24233055
Why have I done the above - well this thread has gone to crap based on todays action on this thread. I have fallen for been baited before, and served a suspension to boot, but I just hope some of us are not reincarnated as fish because we wouldn't last in the water that long around fishermen.
