Greens and Invasion Day., page-68

You make good points and science is takes a lot of twists and turns and we can only imagine what science will discover about the amazing family tree that produced modern humans in 50 years.

I have no argument with your links that are  peer reviewed.

My argument about natives and IQ is that most here seem to think of IQ as a measurement that we are familiar with that measures reading, comprehension, maths and some spatial questions.

But the true basis of IQ needs to be something that measures and compares all equally.

As a result humans need to be tested according to nine types of Intelligence including: 

 

1. Naturalist Intelligence--Nature Smart

 

2. Musical Intelligence--Musical Smart

 

3. Logical-Mathematical Intelligence---Number/ReasoningSmart

 

4. Existential Intelligence— Time and Space Smart

 

5. Interpersonal Intelligence--People Smart

 

6. Bodily-Kinesthetic Intelligence---Body Smart

 

7. Linguistic Intelligence--Word Smart

 

8. Intra-personal Intelligence---Self Smart

 

9. Spatial Intelligence—Picture Smart

For example; 

How do aboriginal football players seem to know who to kick the ball to when it appears they can't see their team mate?

That's spatial intelligence at play and those players have a wider range of peripheral vision than whites in general.

 

Natives would also be far ahead in Kinesthetic intelligence as well.

If a white took on natives in the bush according to the nine types of intelligence shown

I bet most whites would get beaten hands down.

 

How do natives manage to dance in corrobborees all night?

 

Musical and bodily intelligence.

How many whites could beat natives at Naturalist Intelligence?

Not too many.

How many can paint like rock paintings?

I rest my case!