Listless
Agreed that cashflow and Elk's cash position are their main problem. Based on the last quarterly, they are spending about $1.5m/ quarter. This should leave us with approx. $1.3m left in the bank by the end of the June quarter with hardly enough left to last us till the end of the Sept quarter. I suspect that is probably the main reason holding the share price back especially when you consider that the Grieve deal alone values ELK at between $60 to $100m and our current market cap is only $24m.
Ash Creek is one of the keys to solving our cash flow problems in the short term but it needs to exceed the performance of SDS for it to make a differerence IMO. As stated in the Ash Creek update dated 31 March 2011, "It is anticipated that (flow) rates will increase from the impact of Trusler #9 water injection. This can take AT LEAST three months to be reflected in improved oil production as seen in 1964 when water was last injected in Trusler #9 and increased production from Trusler #8."
It has now been 3 months since the above announcement so hopefully we should be due for an announcement regarding Ash Creek's stabilised flow rates soon.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ELK
- grieve development
grieve development, page-20
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add ELK (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online