If jack hills cost $11m to buy and MMX used $500,000 of CHM's money then how can CHM claim half is theirs, would'nt it be 5% theirs if they paid 5% of the cost of the property? Also was'nt it all MMX's labour, capital and hard work developing Jack Hills property into a successful mine that made it go from $11m to $1b in value, CHM contributed absolutley nothing to the development of Jack hills which made it so valuable.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MMX
- grimaldi not testifing
grimaldi not testifing, page-42
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 25 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)