You are posting with out the fact that GSK offered to settle the case for $80million + $20 million costs which would have given BTA a net profit of $80 million for a case started by the former CEO. Instead the idiot Peter Cook refused the offer, spend another $10 million in legal costs and then settle for $10 million.
Peter Cook then told the market, that it was a a wonderful $20 m settlement, blamed the loss on Peter Molloy, then ask shareholders to vote on a resolution to reward him with 430,300 free options.
Given these facts, are you serious to say you are happy with Peter Cook performance?
If you want other readers to take you seriously, I suggest you read previous posts or the BTA announcements before you make stupid statements praising Peter Cook.
BTA Price at posting:
$1.30 Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
