Share
1,160 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 73
clock Created with Sketch.
01/09/21
11:56
Share
Originally posted by Payam:
↑
Please hang on to these words: "The book value is just undervaluation - clearly the company wont sell its assets in these markets at cost price " As I predicted the net tangible asset valuation of the SDG is base on cost only, and the company will not be selling these assets on cost only basis - as highlighted in the latest announcement the co made 24% profit so realistically we can ignore the NTA altogether as the only basis of determination of the special dividends. A good indicator however could be inferred from dividend payments thus far this year that is: At the start of the year NTA was $2.56 per share; SDG paid interim dividend of 30c and final dividend of 20c total of 50c per share and now NTA is $2.36 or thereabouts. Simple mathematical logic suggests : $2.36 in the remaining net asset value could be translated into $5.90 per share in remaining future special dividends. 2 .36 x 50c = 5.90 20c of course there are other factors but these facts are quite telling and on these basis the SP at $2.75/ share is significantly under valued. Please DYOR and feel free to comment if you disagree with these assessments.
Expand
How are you getting $5.90 using simple mathematical logic? NTA at $2.34 with $480m in inventory on the books. Assuming a 20% development margin, you add maybe $0.70 but that's pre-overheads and pre tax. Franking at maybe another $0.50 from here too, but still a long way from $5.90.