Looking at what an authorised officer must consider for deciding whether a person is fit and proper.
Seems social media would come under other information.
Social media might indicate if someone wants a gun for nefarious means or to top themselves.
Usual story of bureaucratic over reach. Punishing law abiding citizens for the behaviour of a few people.
Covering themselves should something go wrong.
Employers doing similar now to job applicants.
Show us your socials.
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/qld/consol_act/wa1990107/s10b.html
....whether there is anycriminal intelligence or other information to which the authorised officer hasaccess that indicates—
(i) the person is a risk to public safety; or
(ii)that authorising the person to possess a weapon would be contrary to thepublic interest; and
(d) the public interest.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Gun Licence - Social Media
Looking at what an authorised officer must consider for deciding...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 17 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
UNT
UNITH LTD
Idan Schmorak, CEO
Idan Schmorak
CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online