I see from Gunns accounts that when they sold the Tamar Ridge wine assets for $32.5M last year Gunns had to take an impairment charge of $32.4M.
Lets hope Gunns will have to make a similar 50% or greater impairment charge on the walnut assets sold to WBA. Until we shareholders get some information from WBA, let alone by some miracle some financial figures, I will be assuming WBA have paid too much if Gunns impairment charge turns out to be less than 50%
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?