Interesting to me that all posts to my original thread seem to be ignoring the other of Iggy's two balls. There was no mention of a cap raising, folks. The ann did not mention that specifically, so there's a bit of extrapolation going on here.
The other ball is the first thing mentioned in the ann, and that is the Mt Caittlin resource. Is it only me, or do these two things possibly relate to each other? If they have discovered that the resource is vast, perhaps funding might be about the exploitation of the larger resource. I know that this seems speculative, but after all...the announcement was about both things, right?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- GXY
- gxy speculation
gxy speculation, page-21
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
FWD
Queensland's housing crisis an opportunity for ASX builder Fleetwood – and taxpayer cash a safe harbour from the storm
RNU
Renascor wins a funding boost given it wants to produce a critical mineral – but $5M award pales in comparison to some