re: re:snooker- you think mufti is inconsequential
Snooker has not given his source for the material he quotes, something which always makes me suspicious. While some of the material may be accurate, the tone is such that it's source seems heavily biased. A zionist publication perhaps?
No one is saying that Hillaly is an angel however, he has, to my own knowledge, been misquoted and misinterpreted quite often by an anti-islamic press corps so we need to be very careful how we come to conclusions about the man.
It may indeed turn out that his participation in the events of Woods "rescue" is not as has been stated however despite what the Bolts and snookers of this world would have us believe, until there is substantiated evidence to the contrary, he should be given the benefit of any doubt.
There has been too much smoke and mirrors associated with this whole event and too many loose ends that don't match up. Clearly, much information is being held back and a whole lot of political capital is being sought by the various groups.
Care to give us the source of your little dossier snooks...?
