@tinnitus Clearly you have NOT viewed the OP video. If you had...

@tinnitus
Clearly you have NOT viewed the OP video. If you had it would make perfect sense why it is in the links.

you are talking out of line Tinnitus. I think you will find that the Bee article is very much in line with most tree huggers.

Now i am no tree hugger but I found it a interesting piece.

In regards to the papers/ articles on Water. I am unable to comment in regars to you guys not accepting the work being put out by world Washington State university and Stanford University.

if you have a disagreement with their work perhaps you could summarise why the papers are flawed.


While the rest of the world accepts Pollack's work and also no reason to dispute the new Stanford paper you guys just spew out rubbish claims with NO justification at all. Some people are fascinated by new developments in science.

Others are repulsed by it. I call them flat earthers! Do you fit that tag.