hang on lol...$2 dividends aren't sustainable, page-23

So 5hareholder, what you're saying is, that the $2 yearly dividends are not achievable, and the $3 dividends and more that have also been circulated around here by others, are totally pipes dreams.

Let's see if they have something in reply to discredit your post.

After all, there are others here that are professing to be Geos.

Me, as a number cruncher, I can't dispute your figures, and only a Geo can discredit your findings by disputing the percentage of copper equivalent that is under there.

Is anyone out there available for the takings ? For I would have to give up and admit to your comments without a fight.

Cheers.