again you concentrate on someone else, you refuse to talk about...

again you concentrate on someone else, you refuse to talk about etm and its problems . Again you use imaginary made up numbers as fact , try to explain the $6 billion loss when the whole company today is not worth what you paid for the license 18 years ag. Taking inflation into account the losses to share holders from doing this deal must be at least double the value of the company. Why because of poor advice from its inner circle for not seeking non uranium orebodies on their license like eudialyte.
Are you still a consultant to etm we know you used to be which ever it is should you not declare that on every submission