happy times ahead, page-29

Psi wrote:
"As some have pointed out, the original statement is geologically ridiculous."

Avarist wrote:
"the original statement is fine, i cant be so specific to say it is in this very instance (i will find out) but there is nothing wrong about what he has said"

woo hoo Duelling Geos.

Now we just need Conix and Ya to pipe up, I'm sure they can find two distinct positions to claim for themselves so we can have four opposing professional opinions.

Anyone else care to stake a professional challenge?

Actually I think that JH and the ensemble at CTP have put their professional reputations on the line at the moment, we'll see if it pays off in the long run.

- Karl