Hard Evidence., page-7

Hi Sparecash, Yes it is the hard Evidence thread..

Here is the two parts of WKT's announcement which states they expect to hit 1/3 capacity by the end of July, why do you continue to claim that the non holders make up these comments?


2nd of July WKT ASX announcement - Highlights


2nd of July WKT ASX Announcement - Page 2





Why do you think Mike's Tweet suggested the plant had already achieved well above these levels and you stated "Well I know for a fact the plant throughput has been over 30tph which is over 2/3rds its nameplate capacity"

I think your "Hard Evidence" is starting to point out that these marketing tweets shouldn't be used to form any investment decision, I did say recently, Mike should have stopped tweeting after WKT made its first production. with these tweets appearing to conflict recent ASX announcements its not a great look to see holders like yourself become so confused on WKT's output. I can understand why you thought WKT wouldn't need to draw down on Gemcorps "Back up Funding" we have LTH claim WKT only required US$10mil out of this facility and they would have US$10mil available.

Anyway, can you please help clear up the error in Mike's tweet below regarding the TGC grade WKT, the 2nd of July announcement stated; "To date, plant feed has been from the development ore stockpile that was created during the construction phase and the head feed grade is steady between 13 - 14% TGC"?