I don't know if it has bearing on the CHM case per se, it may...

I don't know if it has bearing on the CHM case per se, it may pave the way for the current case to continue on. I would need to look at that closer specifically in regard the proceedings and how the settlement came to be.

The second point, regardless of the MMX letter, may have set a precedent. I simply can't for the likes of me understand why they would do what they did publicly.

My concern really stems from the fact this case seems wide open to further litigation in favour of CHM, to the detriment of MMX. Will this be detrimental to the Oakajee port ultimately? That is what I really want to know and I am sure Yilgarn is watching with interest at the moment.

I am sure the WA government will be wanting to confirm all is well as so much is riding on the port.

Good luck here though, I hope MMX comes through unscathed. That is the ideal outcome for the port now as any changes would simply cause further delays. The only winners I see here either way are once again the lawyers...on both sides.