been over this before extenuating circumstances doesn't count as a 'public interest' arguement.. the public interest arguement would be something like the state believes that maintaiing its strong relationship with RIO is in the publics best interest etc... just seems way to flimsy, would be a scandalous decision,,
nothing new to be said her just a matter of waiting
- Forums
- ASX - General
- hardrock
been over this before extenuating circumstances doesn't count as...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CAZ (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
1.9¢ |
Change
-0.001(5.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $8.764M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
1.9¢ | 1.9¢ | 1.9¢ | $2.552K | 134.3K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 139578 | 1.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
2.0¢ | 425001 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 139578 | 0.019 |
4 | 558965 | 0.018 |
3 | 585000 | 0.017 |
4 | 530301 | 0.016 |
1 | 82917 | 0.012 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.020 | 425001 | 1 |
0.021 | 274000 | 2 |
0.023 | 463500 | 4 |
0.024 | 200000 | 1 |
0.026 | 69333 | 2 |
Last trade - 14.58pm 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
CAZ (ASX) Chart |