Harris - Walz, page-1587

  1. 24,416 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 8

    "Clearly he gained a benefit by claiming service not rendered.

    A very easy case to make"

    What benefit did he receive ?

    The 2013 Act mentions but does not define a "tangible benefit".

    Alternatively, as a politician, he has made statements that, whilst not making direct claims, could be misinterpreted by the audience as making claims that were not true.

    Get it ?


    I'm sure you've noticed that the attacks are being led by Vance who, like Walz, is a Veteran and not by Trump who is not.


    BTW, any reason for posting the repealed 2005 Act as "evidence" ??

 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.