"Clearly he gained a benefit by claiming service not rendered.
A very easy case to make"
What benefit did he receive ?
The 2013 Act mentions but does not define a "tangible benefit".
Alternatively, as a politician, he has made statements that, whilst not making direct claims, could be misinterpreted by the audience as making claims that were not true.
Get it ?
I'm sure you've noticed that the attacks are being led by Vance who, like Walz, is a Veteran and not by Trump who is not.
BTW, any reason for posting the repealed 2005 Act as "evidence" ??
- Forums
- World Politics
- Harris - Walz
Harris - Walz, page-1587
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3,058 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)