Harris - Walz, page-2391

You must have begun one fith kid... never listening to what people said. Still clearly fith and so blinded by dumb party loyalty... you see the sun shine and deny its daytime

Dude...he said:
1. DT was ahead by more than 2%. Got it >2%
2. He said there was only 2% outstanding.
3. He said even if one got 100% of that 2% (a statistical impossibilty)..but even if that happened... it wouldnt change the outcome.

See...he recognised 2.5% is a larger # than 2%. Tough concept for some to grasp but there it is

And then you, in your delusion, say... he didn't say that and you're proof is that not only did JB DID get 100%... but seeing DT was ahead BY MORE THAN 2%.....that somhow JB STILL managed to win.

Go on, Einstein... explain the unexplainable...

Maybe see if your brain trust of @Glug and @Justis can help you with the maths and the statistical impossibilities