It seems a bit rich that one US authority would not allow this transaction to progress on antitrust concerns "which could cause an anti-competitive effect in the market" while another agency refuses to allow the product to be sold.
Is this part of the Keep America Great conspiracy to ensure US companies get first bite of the cherry. There are other companies in the field after all and stonewalling foreign ones will help allow them time to catch up. Would this have been invoked if the partner was J&J for example? My trust in the US system dims.
It seems a bit rich that one US authority would not allow this...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 15 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add MSB (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.09 |
Change
-0.050(4.39%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.244B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.14 | $1.17 | $1.07 | $8.385M | 7.489M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8500 | $1.08 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.09 | 26954 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 19/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| MSB (ASX) Chart |