Harvard historian: strategy of climate science, page-26

Hunnyman
You have posted a *** argument. Do you know what that means?

Eg: No one is arguing that the Climate hasn't changed over the billion year time frame,

No one is saying that the change over the timescale you are suggesting can be stopped,

Yes , some adaptation will have to occur as we have already added a few degrees to the temp,
So lets have the survivors breed .

So are you suggesting just keep doing what the science says is wrong , because those what survive in the long run will be better evolved, adapted for it ?

Is there any other type of pollution that we can ignore ? After all, the ones that adapt can survive whatever you throw at them.