Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Septa If I was a climate scientist looking at, say, the impact...

First 9 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
tinnitus

24,181 Posts.

30

26/07/14

13:29

Post #: 13719017
Share

Originally posted by septa ↑

That article that we are talking about is PURELY political. Where is the science in that article?

SO in terms of what you say. The article present actually disproves your post completely.

None of these people we are meant to trust did researching disproving the wild claims that Al Gore and Flannery were making back in '07 etc. The question is, if they are climate scientists why aren't they addressing that issue without bias? If this was medical science and a quack was making a wild claim about a treatment option, even the doctors who support that treatment option would come out en masse against the wild claims. This doesn't happen in climate science.

It's because they won't bite the hand that feeds them.

Expand

Septa
If I was a climate scientist looking at, say, the impact of reduced rainfall on the Amazon rainforest, why the hell would I want to research the words of Gore or Flanery?
2 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

OSL

OncoSil wraps up recruitment for key pancreatic cancer trial

NMG

New Murchison Gold blasts off at Crown Prince as 'better than expected' results return

KGD

Kula picks up unexplored niobium play in Malawi, with surface samples logged

Week 27 Wrap: 40% China tariffs?; ASX +10% FY25; US Amazon price spike

THL

Tourism Holdings says Liberation Day tariffs smashed US RV demand

DMP

Is Domino's a steal after -25% plunge?

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 016 – FY25 ended up not so bad... but Trump unpause is coming

HotCopper Highlights, Week 27: G8 scalped, Domino’s drops the box, Gemlife brief hype & more

I88

Infini Resources onto Phase 2 at Portland Creek after spotting 'widespread uranium'

Trump chides Powell as Goldman call for calm. The RBA must be nervous

First 9 Last

SPONSORED BY