I have no interest in Weinstein, his guilt or otherwise. What I find interesting is the judicial misconduct.
In a 4-3 decision, the New York Court of Appeals said the trial judge made a mistake by letting women testify that Weinstein assaulted them, even though their accusations were not part of the charges he faced."The remedy for these egregious errors is a new trial," Judge Jenny Rivera wrote for the majority.
That was from SBS who made no mention of the prosecutor, so I went to Breitbart which is not so shy:
At this point, Manhattan’s district attorney, Trump persecutor Alvin L. Bragg, can choose to retry Weinstein or give up and ship the infamous, Oscar-winning producer to California.
This whole fiasco strikes me as a classic case of framing a guilty man. It is beyond outrageous that the prosecutor was allowed to parade a series of women before the jury to make unproven claims of sexual misconduct against Weinstein. That goes beyond prejudicial and directly to rigging a trial.
Did he just say that Bragg, who is prosecuting Trump, is overzealous?
- Forums
- World Politics
- Harvey Weinstein's 2020 conviction for sexual assault and rape overturned
I have no interest in Weinstein, his guilt or otherwise. What I...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online