I suspect that the majority of MCB nominated directors will be...

I suspect that the majority of MCB nominated directors will be voted in, due to the nature off poll voting.

The only way that they will be prevented from becoming director’s is if there are clauses within the ASIC legislation or ASX that gives Pat the power to claim that they are not representing the wishes off the majority of individual shareholders.

Personally, I believe that MCB is wasting his money by polling shareholders because the odds are in his favour.
Why would the previous Chair and directors resign if they believed they had the advantage over him - polling voting method and not individual shareholders was the reason for their resignation!

One of the nominated director is an Environmental Professor who should be following ESG guideline’s for sourcing material that is to used to make renewable equipment for AGL.

The following example could be a guideline for him!

EMILI (Exploitation de MIca Lithinifère par Imerys) is one of the largest lithium extraction projects in Europe, which would offer a long-term solution and meet Europe's decarbonization goals.

…and in accordance with the IRMA standard, which is considered the benchmark for responsible mining. Among other things, the company plans to use underground mining methods to “minimise the impact on the natural habitat”. In addition, the project design is to be “developed with the involvement of all local private and public stakeholders”.

Imerys claims to want to mine lithium with less than half the CO2 emissions of typical existing hard rock lithium operations in the world. This will be achieved by, among other things, an electric-powered mining fleet, transport by underground pipelines, trains and the use of the French electricity mix (with a high proportion of nuclear power).