It just seems your posts are overly biased, more about marketing...

First 16 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
pauljbo470

11,961 Posts.

151

16/05/24

13:13

Post #: 73856974
Share

Originally posted by Lapdog: ↑

@pauljbo470; IMO China grossly over-reacted by imposing those oppressive trade sanctions against Australian producers.

Was it predictable? Absoloutely!

IMO because of the bombastic verbal abuse our incredibly stupid US brown-nosing politicians were hurling at China re the origin and management of Covid, the bans we've placed on Huwaei etc and our support for the USA's provocative military interventions into the South China Sea Region I think it was not only predictable but intentional / planned.

The USA benefited enormously from the impact Chinese sanctions had on Australia - China sourced most of the banned product from from our great mate, the USA - albeit second rate quality and more expensive than what was being provided by our producers.

China's decision to wind back those sanctions now that Albanese and Wong are messaging less abusively is IMO still not set in concrete. If Australia further ingratiates itself to the USA by mimicking its demands for the World to only allow US social media corporations to exist - banning TikTok - we may poke China too hard in the eye and suffer even more severe consequences - China's rapidly developing alternative sources of minerals from multiple sources in Africa and Mongolia that would enable it to terminate supplies from Australia ... for example.

Expand

It just seems your posts are overly biased, more about marketing than message. You have a lot in common with Morrison.

"the USA's provocative military interventions into the South China Sea Region"
So you are supportive of Chinas claims and military interventions against those that do not respect Chinas self declared boundaries?

I suppose if China attacks Taiwan, that will also be the fault of the US.
Upvote

Reply